✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Aug 2004

Judgment · High Court · 2004

Judgment

Shri Y.S. Bhate for the petitioner. Shri S.R. Nargolkar AGP for the State - respondents nos. 1 to 4. ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR MRS.MRS.MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; 31ST AUGUST, 2004. 31ST AUGUST, 2004. DATED; DATED; 31ST AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. By petition, petitioner a mandamus directing respondents petitioner recognition permission a school. Application purpose was made 2000 i.e. 2000-01. This period over. petitioner application The recognition obviously recurring. Keeping this right alive to the petitioner, this petition is

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 1778 of 2002). ← Search more judgments