Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2922 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s orders. Mr.R.D.Soni i/by M/s.Ram & Co for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th September 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The challenge in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to an order of assessment dated 12th July 2003 passed by the respondent-Municipal Corporation. It is not in dispute that the order of assessment has been challenged by the petitioner by preferring an appeal under section 406 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the said appeal is pending. 2 Hence, prayer clause (a) cannot be granted. ( 2) However, the appeal deserves to be expedited. Accordingly, it is directed that Municipal Appeal No.16 of 2003 shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible and preferably before the end of this year. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(A.S.OKA,J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — s. 406.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Sep 2010. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.