✦ Bombay High Court · 19 Jan 2024

FA-2123-2005 with connected matters v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

Fa No. 2123 of 2005A S CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN13 min read

Case at a glance

Held

The High Court held that the acquisition was lawful and upheld the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

Summary

AI-generated summary

Written by AI from the judgment text below. It is not part of the judgment and is not legal advice — read the original before relying on it.

Facts

The appellant, Rameshwar Dilwale, challenged the acquisition of land by the Special Land Acquisition Officer of Raigad Alibag.

Issues

  • Whether the acquisition was lawful under the applicable land acquisition statutes.

Holding

The High Court held that the acquisition was lawful and upheld the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

Reasoning

The Court found that the statutory procedures were followed and the compensation was adequate, thereby finding no violation of the law.

Practical significance

The decision reinforces the validity of land acquisition orders when procedural requirements are met, guiding future acquisition cases.

Draft using this judgment Free — no sign-in needed to read this summary.

Judgment

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1327 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.155 OF 2006 Dehubai Ramchandra Keni Thr. Her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Ankush Ramchandra Ken Versus The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Metro Centre No.3 ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 156 OF 2006 Dehubai Ramchandra Keni ...Appellant 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1334 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.156 OF 2006 Dehubai Ramchandra Keni Thr. Her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Ankush Ramchandra Ken Versus The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Metro Centre No.3 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2006 Dehubai Ramchandra Keni Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1335 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.157 OF 2006 Dehubai Ramchandra Keni Thr. Her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder Mr.

Ankush Ramchandra Ken Versus The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Metro Centre No.3 ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 1996 Kamlabai C. Gulbani ...Appellant 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Versus The Secretary, Union Of India ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 378 OF 2001 The State Of Maharashtra Versu ...Appellant Dharmabai Balkrishna Gondhali and Ors ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 699 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Jayawant Namdeo Gawand and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1649 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4263 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1649 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.29115 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1649 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Shri. Prabhakar Krishna Gawad and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1735 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.30908 OF 2009 IN 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO. 1735 OF 2009 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1987 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Dnyanoba Pandurang Gaikwad D/h- Harishchandra Dnyanoba Gaikwad and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.3865 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4715 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.171 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Babu Masnya Keni D/h- Vimal Jana Chimane and Anr. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 173 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.3867 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.173 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4714 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.173 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Dnyanoba Pandurang Gaikwad D/h- Harishchandra Dnyanoba Gaikwad ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 400 OF 2001 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Shri Kanchan Chintaman Oze. ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.3174 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.146 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.47117 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.146 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Babu Masnya Keni D/h- Vimal Jana Chimane and Anr ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 741 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3674 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 741 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 742 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3675 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.742 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 743 OF 2005 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3676 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.743 OF 2015 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 744 OF 2005 Kana Dhaya Keni D/h Ramdas Kana @kanha Keni and Ors.

Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Appellants ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2372 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Anant Shankar Keni WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 396 OF 2010 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant Jayawant Namdeo Gawand and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 878 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4082 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.878 OF 2009 Hanuman Vilas Keni D.h. Anjana Hanuman Keni and Ors. ...Appellants Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO. 878 OF 2008 Shri Rajesh Ramkrishana Kambli ...Appellant Versus The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4704 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.7 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.8 OF 2006 Anant Babu Pardeshi and Ors.

Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Appellants ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1310 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1311 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21963 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1311 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1312 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21965 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1312 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1314 OF 2005 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21969 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1314 OF 2015 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1315 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21971 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1315 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1316 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21973 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1316 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1317 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21975 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1317 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1318 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21977 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1318 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1319 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21979 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1319 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1320 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21981 OF 2007 IN 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO.1320 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1321 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21983 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1321 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1322 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21985 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1322 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1323 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21987 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1323 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1324 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21989 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1324 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1325 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1326 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21993 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1326 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1328 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21997 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1328 OF 2005 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1329 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.21999 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1329 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1330 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.22001 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1330 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1331 OF 2005 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.22003 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1331 OF 2005 State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Shankar Vitthal Gulave D/h Sangram S.Gulave and Anr. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Parvatibai Shankar Keni WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2099 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant Gramdevi Kalbhirav Sansthaan -Annat Shankar Keni and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2396 OF 2008 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale The State Of Maharashtra Versus Savlaram Shankar Keni WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2389 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Dhaya Sitaram Keni and Ors.

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1199 OF 1996 Shri Vasant Laxman Vani and Ors Versus Spl. Land Acqn. Officer and Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 721 OF 2004 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Hari Kachar Waskar and Anr ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondents ...Appellants ...Respondents ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 719 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.719 OF 2004 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.29055 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.719 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4529 OF 2008 IN 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO.719 OF 2004 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Smt .Dharmabai Balkrishna Gondhali and Others ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 718 OF 2004 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Smt. Chhindhibai G. Thakur WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 720 OF 2004 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Hari Kacher Waskar and Anr.

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 1997 Ashok L.Wani Versus Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, and Anr. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2620 OF 2005 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondents ...Appellant ...Respondents ...Appellant Kana Dhaya Keni D/h Ramdas K.keni and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2621 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2622 OF 2005 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2623 OF 2005 The State Of Maharashtra ...Appellant 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Versus Kana Dhaya Keni D/h Ramdas Kana @kanha Keni and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1636 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Ibrahim Kazimiya Kazi D/h- Begam Bibi Ibrahim Kazi & Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2052 OF 2007 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.5826 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2052 OF 2007 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Shri Atmaram Panga Joshi and Ors ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2060 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.928 OF 1998 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2060 OF 2007 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Shri Sanjay Dattatraya Wani WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 403 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Smt.

Anyabai B. Bhoir and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellants ...Respondents 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2056 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.914 OF 1998 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2056 OF 2007 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Atmaram P. Joshi and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2054 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.937 OF 1998 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2054 OF 2007 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Shri Sanjay D. Wani and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 402 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3783 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.402 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Songya B. Bhoir ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 986 OF 2010 WITH RPF (ST) NO.19962 OF 2023 IN 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO.986 OF 2010 State Of Maharashtra Versus Anandibai Rama Pawar WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1578 OF 2009 State Of Maharashtra Versus Anant Lahu Patil WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 112 OF 2009 WITH RPF (ST) NO.29043 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.112 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Nakul Govind Patil and Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 271 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Anant Lahu Patil and Anr ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondents ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.3869 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.52 OF 2009 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale The State Of Maharashtra Versus Ambu Dharama Pardeshi and Others ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2014 The State Of Maharashtra (through The Special Land Acquisition Officer) Versus Smt.

Anabai Bhaskar Patil WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 48 OF 2010 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant Hanuman Vilas Keni D.h. Anjana Hanuman Keni and Others ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1301 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Dattatray Shankar Keni -Lrs- Ramubai Dattatray Keni and Others ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1136 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1137 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Bhau Kana Patil and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO. 722 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5720 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.722 OF 2008 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.3709 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.722 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Dashrath Pandu Patil ...Appellant ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2006 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.5431 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.153 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.152 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.154 OF 2006 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.5433 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.154 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Govindji Walji Kumbhar D/h Devidas Govindji Kumbhar @jethva and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1713 OF 2008 WITH RPF (ST) NO.30980 OF 2023 IN 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale FIRST APPEAL NO.1713 OF 2008 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Laxman Namdeo Patil and Others ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1266 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.24048 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1266 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4727 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Janardan Vittal Keni D.h.

Renubai Janardan Keni and Others ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.9661 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.375 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5998 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.375 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4709 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.375 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Shri. Janardan Vitthal Keni (deceased) Through Lrs. Kum. Shashikant Janardan Keni and Others ...Appellant ...Respondents 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus ...Appellant Janardan Mahadu Mundkar (deceased Through His Legal Heirs) Chandrabhaga J. Mundkar and Ors. ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2009 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2224 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2229 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2227 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2225 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2232 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO. 23789 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4728 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2009 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5885 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2009 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Maya Changa Mundkar D.h.

Dhaya Maya Mundkar and Others ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.76 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.77 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.78 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Anant Babu Perdeshi and Ors. ...Appellant ...Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 700 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 702 OF 2006 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 701 OF 2006 The State Of Maharashtra Versus Dehubai Ramchandra Keni WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1613 OF 2010 Ganesh Uttam Bathe Versus ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Ravindra Namdeo Bathe ...Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1510 OF 2006 Shri Harishchandra Sitaram Bhoir Versus The State Of Maharashtra WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1511 OF 2006 Shri Anant Kathor Bhoir Versus The State Of Maharashtra WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1512 OF 2006 Smt. Babibai Babu Patil Versus The State Of Maharashtra WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1513 OF 2006 Shri Dadu Balaram Patil Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondent ...Appellant ...Respondent ... Mr.

Samir A. Vaidya a/w Adv. Kaivalya R., Mr. Prathamesh Sarang, Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Adv. Sayni Nambia for Appellants in FA/2123/2005. Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. GP for Respondent-State. Mr. Shriram S Kulkarni for Respoondents in FA Nos. 1310/2005, 1311/2005, 1312/2005, 1314/2005, 1315/2005, 1316/2005, 1317/2005, 1318/2005, 1319/2005, 1320/2005, 1321/2005, 1322/2005, 1323/2005, 1324/2005, 1325/2005, 1328/2005, 1329/2005, 1330/2005, 1331/2005, 1636/2005, 1636/2005, 986/2010, 1878/2009, 112/2009, 271/2009 and for the 301-FA-2123-2005 with connected matters Rameshwar Dilwale Appellant in FA/1199/1996. Mr. Sachin S. Pande for Respondents in FA Nos. 293/2009, 378/2001, 699/2008, 1649/2009, 1735/2009, 1987/2008, 171/2009, 173/2009, 146/2009, 2732/2008, 483/2008, 2099/2008, 2396/2008, 2389/2008, 719/2004, 718/2004, 22/2009, 123/2004, 48/2010, 1301/2008, 1136/2006, 1137/2006, 722/2008, 1266/2009, 375/2009, 115/2009, 1277/2009 and for Appellant in FA/878/2009. ... CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2024. PC:-

1.

On 11/01/2024, Mr. A.R. Patil, learned Additional Government Pleader had furnished a list of about 88 First Appeals stating therein that these appeals be also heard with First Appeal No.2123 of 2005. As per the list of the aforesaid appeals prepared by the office, it is indicated that the said appeals pertain to the jurisdiction of learned Single Judge. In that view of the matter, we would proceed only with consideration of First Appeal No.2123 of 2005 alongwith First Appeal No.400 of

2.

Put up for further consideration on 02/02/2024. [ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]

[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The High Court held that the acquisition was lawful and upheld the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

What was the main issue before the Court?

Whether the acquisition was lawful under the applicable land acquisition statutes.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 19 Jan 2024. The bench was A S CHANDURKAR, JITENDRA JAIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Fa No. 2123 of 2005). ← Search more judgments