✦ Bombay High Court · 15 Feb 2011

Anant Raghunath Vaity & Ors. v. Sharad Jagannath Vaity & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 57 of 2011A A SAYED, P B MAJMUDAR

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 57 OF 2011 Anant Raghunath Vaity & Ors. V/s. Sharad Jagannath Vaity & Ors.. ... ... Petitioners. Respondents. Mr. Amit Borkar i/by Shashi Kumar Pandey for petitioners. Mr. Snehal Shah for respondent nos. 1 to 21. Mr. N.G. Thakkar, Sr. Adv., for respondent no. 22. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for respondent nos. 23 & 24. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioners state that since disputed questions of fact arise in this matter, the petitioners would like to withdraw this petition with a view to take out appropriate alternative proceedings. Since the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with a view to take out alternative proceedings such as a civil suit, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion the merits of the matter. (A.A.SAYED, J.)

(P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 57 of 2011). ← Search more judgments