✦ Bombay High Court · 26 Apr 2022

Rajendra Dashrath Khurche v. Department & Ors.

Interim Application No. 3221 of 2021G A SANAP, A S CHANDURKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

the application is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make an

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The Application is disposed of. (G. A. SANAP, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

Judgment

Mr. C. K. Bhangoji i/b Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for the Applicant- Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4-State. Mr. Sachin Gite for Respondent No.3. ---- CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G. A. SANAP, JJ. DATE : 26 APRIL 2022 P. C. This application has been moved by the petitioner in view of directions contained in paragraph No.8(f) of the judgment dated 6/3/2014 in Writ Petition No.5631/2013. By that direction liberty was granted to the petitioner to seek reinstatement if the validity certificate is issued to him.

Operative part

2.

The Petitioner claims that on 24/11/2020 the validity RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE 11:30:40 +0530 rsk 2 certificate has been issued to the petitioner. In that view of the matter the application is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make an application to respondent No.3 seeking reinstatement in light of directions contained in paragraph No.8 (f) of the aforesaid judgment. If said application is made the same shall be considered by respondent No.3 in accordance with law.

3.

The Application is disposed of. (G. A. SANAP, J.)

(A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the application is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make an

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 26 Apr 2022. The bench was G A SANAP, A S CHANDURKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 3221 of 2021). ← Search more judgments