Magarpatta Township Development v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. None present for the respondents. The Application is for amendment on account of subsequent events. Considering that, Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. Civil Application disposed of accordingly.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5974 OF 2008 Magarpatta Township Development & Construction Company Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the petitioners. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2009 P.C.
None present for the respondents. The Application is for amendment on account of subsequent events. Considering that, Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. Civil Application disposed of accordingly.
Considering that at the time Rule was issued the respondents have appeared it is presumed that the respondents have waived service. Hence no Bhatta charges be asked from the petitioners. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.