Surendra Bhagwanrao Jagtap & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Judgment
None for the Petitioners. Mr. A.I.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent nos. 1 to 6/State. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2005 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2004 State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Surendra Bhagwanrao Jagtap & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. A.I.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent nos. 1 to 6/State. None for the Petitioners. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1 2 None for the Petitioner. On behalf of the State affidavit has been filed by Punam H.Wagde, Deputy Secretary to the Government, Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai to the effect that pursuance to the order of this court arrears of 5th Pay 2 6 cp 158.04.doc Commission are sanctioned and the Government Resolution dated
Operative part
30.07.2010 has been issued accordingly. It is also stated that the benefit of 6th Pay Commission was also made applicable to the employees including the Petitioners by the Government Resolution dated 16.08.2010. Thus, the orders of this court have been fully complied. In view of this, nothing remains in the Petition and the Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 2 As the Contempt Petition itself is disposed of, the Civil Application No.65 of 2005 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly.
[ J.H.BHATIA, J. ]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 02 Sep 2010. The bench was H BHATIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.