✦ Bombay High Court · 11 Jan 2005

The Agricultural Produce Market v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 3 of 2005F I REBELLO

Judgment

Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondents. ... Petitioner CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : JANUARY 11, 2005 P.C. . Considering judgement Division Bench Court Agricultural Produce market Committee Ors. Vs. The State Maharashtra Ors. 1988 (1) Bom. C.R. 168 interference called for. However, respondents directed complete election process considering programme finalisation voters already notified, thereafter complete election process within statutory period. With the above observations, petition stands disposed of. . P.A. to issue authenticated copy of this order.

(F.I. REBELLO,J.)

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3 of 2005). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching