✦ Bombay High Court · 14 Jan 2005

Judgment · High Court · 2005

Civil Petition No. 1 of 2005F I REBELLO, REBELLO3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Set aside

order is set aside the election programme

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Considering that the impugned order is set aside the election programme not to be proceeded with. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Judgment

passed necessary various controversy findings recorded Court. The learned Judge impugned paragraph 15 relied various documents produced instance petitioner herein. grievance election petitioner. The The respondent NO.1 herein documents produced evidence closed inspite objections raised Respondent No.1 Respondent No.1 challenge authenticity documents. It submitted opportunity should authenticity petitioner challenge documents. failure comply requirement this ground alone the impugned order is liable to be set aside. As

2.

In the impugned order the learned Judge pleased record a finding sometime petitioner herein Bandu Govind Shinde sometime Shinde Bandu Eknath. The whether documents paragraph 15 relied without giving opportunity respondent No.1 contesting respondents. In opinion documentary evidence unless admitted Respondents proved course evidence. That done. That documents produced opportunity contesting respondents. That having not been given the impugned order on that count is liable to be set aside.

3.

In the light of that Rule made absolute prayer clause (b). The matter remanded learned Judge. The petitioner, advised, documents listed paragraph 15 produce course examination. The Court having allowed petitioner documents permit evidence. The contesting respondents allowed examine petitioner evidence desire aspect matter. The Court thereafter to pass appropriate orders according to law.

Operative part

4.

Considering that the impugned order is set aside the election programme not to be proceeded with. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (F.I.

(F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: order is set aside the election programme

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 14 Jan 2005. The bench was F I REBELLO, REBELLO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Petition No. 1 of 2005). ← Search more judgments