✦ Bombay High Court · 10 Feb 2009

SAS v. The Union of India & Ors.

Civil Application No. 254 of 2009RANJANA DESAI, P DEVADHAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Civil application is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Civil application is disposed of. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Judgment

Mr.P.D.Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the petitioner. Mr.Dubey i/b. H.P.Chaturvedi for respondent for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :-

1.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The civil application is filed seeking amendment of the petition. By the proposed amendment, the petitioners are seeking to bring on record the submissions made at the time of admission of the petition. Hence leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today.

Operative part

2.

Civil application is disposed of. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Civil application is disposed of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 10 Feb 2009. The bench was RANJANA DESAI, P DEVADHAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 254 of 2009). ← Search more judgments