✦ Bombay High Court · 03 Jan 2006

Judgment · High Court · 2006

Criminal Appeal No. 904 of 2003R S MOHITE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. This is an application for restoration of Criminal Appeal No.904/2003. Liberty is granted to the applicant to remove the office objections before the next date. Place the matter on 11.1.2006 before the regular court. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Ashok Varma i/by M/s. Mayur & Co. for the applicant. Mr.A.R.Patil, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. VACATION JUDGE DATED :JANUARY 3, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C.

1. Heard both sides.

2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 174 days in filing the application for restoration of the Criminal Appeal No.904 of 2003. For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of Criminal Appeal, delay is condoned. Application is accordingly disposed of. :2: CRI. APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2006

1.

This is an application for restoration of Criminal Appeal No.904/2003. Liberty is granted to the applicant to remove the office objections before the next date. Place the matter on 11.1.2006 before the regular court.

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 904 of 2003). ← Search more judgments