✦ Bombay High Court · 17 Mar 2005

Vishal Jagannath Thakur v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 1145 of 2005R M LODHA, LODHA, R S MOHITE, MOHITE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by the following order: Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division (respondent directed decide petitioner’s possible no.2) later than two months from the date of the production of the order of this Court. No costs. (R.M. LODHA,J.)…

Judgment

Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Rane,A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & R. S. MOHITE,JJ. DATED : 17th March 2005 P.C. Heard.

2.

Rule. Returnable forthwith. Mr.R.D.Rane,A.G.P. waives service for the respondents.

3.

By consent of the learned counsel, rule is heard finally at this stage.

4.

During course hearing, learned counsel parties agreed petitioner’s deserves considered decided Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee expeditiously. The learned counsel respondent no.2 submitted probability within months Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate 2 Scrutiny Committee would be in a position to decide the petitioner’s caste claim.

5.

Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by the following order: Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division (respondent directed decide petitioner’s possible no.2) later than two months from the date of the production of the order of this Court. No costs. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) (R.S. MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.) (R.S.

(R.S. MOHITE,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1145 of 2005). ← Search more judgments