In Ahsok DayaldasBulchandani v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application is disposed off
Judgment
Operative part
Mr.Anil Lalla i/b. M/s.Lalla & Lalla for applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State. Mr.Arfan Sait for resp.no.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. July 9, 2007. P.C. . The order dated 11th November 2005 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai self-operative articles to be returned to the complainant i.e. the present applicant after the appeal period was over. . Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2006 has already been admitted Court 31/1/2006 appear restraining passed Court against present applicant acting 11/11/2005. Hence applicant’s remedy approach Sessions Court return 2 articles 11/11/2005. The application is disposed off accordingly.
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed off
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Nov 2005. The bench was B H MARLAPALLE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.