Judgment · High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
appeal is disposed of in terms of consent
Judgment
Operative part
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.104 OF 2005 Office notes, office Coram, Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. : : : : : Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. S.V. Pitre for the appellant. Mr. Vaibhav Patankar for the respondent. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 13TH FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C.:- The appellant and the respondent are present in the court. Consent terms duly signed by the appellant and the respondent and their respective advocates are taken on record and marked `X'. Order in terms of consent terms. The appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(D.B. BHOSALE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is disposed of in terms of consent
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Feb 2006. The bench was D B BHOSALE, RANJANA DESAI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.