Writ Appeal No. 925 of 2012 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 18 Sep 2012
- Bench
- V ESWARAIAH, N RAVI SHAKNAR
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Appeal is disposed of in the above terms
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that this writ appeal itself can be disposed of directing the appellant/Board of Governors of the appellant to take a decision in the matter with regard to renewal of…
- Para 77. The Writ Appeal is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _______________________ N. RAVI SHAKNAR, J 18th September 2012 CVRK Note: Issue wire at party’s costs. B/O CVRK
Judgment
single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.20154 of 2012 giving certain directions to it.
The order that was challenged in the above writ petition was an order received by the writ petitioners on 30.06.2012 from the appellant rejecting their request for renewal of permission for admission of third batch of 100 MBBS 1st year students under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, for the academic year 2012-13.
In the said writ petition on 09.07.2012 notice before admission was ordered and on the same date interim order was granted directing the appellant to depute an inspection team to inspect the college premises afresh to find out whether the deficiencies pointed out in the earlier inspection report have been rectified and, if so, to take a decision in the matter with regard to renewal of permission as sought in the writ petition. All the details are mentioned in the impugned order. It is not necessary for us to go into these aspects in detail for the purpose of this writ appeal which is filed against the above interim order.
It is now brought to our notice by both the counsel that pursuant to the impugned order, the appellant had deputed an inspection team which inspected the premises of the college on 12th and 13th of July 2012 and submitted a report to the appellant to that effect. It is also stated that the said inspection report was placed before the Board of Governors of the appellant on or about
16.07.2012, but the complaint of the writ petitioners is that till now no decision has been taken by the Board in the matter.
It is stated by Sri S.R.Ashok, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, that if the Board takes a decision one way or the other in the matter the writ petitioners would work out their remedies.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that this writ appeal itself can be disposed of directing the appellant/Board of Governors of the appellant to take a decision in the matter with regard to renewal of permission for admission as sought in the writ petition, if the decision has not already been taken, as expeditiously as possible preferably in the next meeting of the Board of Governors of the appellant and communicate the decision taken thereon forthwith to the writ petitioners. However, if the decision in the matter has already been taken by the appellant, it shall communicate the decision taken in the matter forthwith to the writ petitioners.
Operative part
The Writ Appeal is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _______________________ N. RAVI SHAKNAR, J 18th September 2012 CVRK Note: Issue wire at party’s costs. B/O CVRK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Appeal is disposed of in the above terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 — s. 10A.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 18 Sep 2012. The bench was V ESWARAIAH, N RAVI SHAKNAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.