Palvai Subhadra v. This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 2l
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed Misceilaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- P.GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER One CC to Sri Vemula Suresh , Advocate [OPU Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for Hyderabad. [OUTI Two CD…
Judgment
Sri Tejas Nandlal Pawar, l.A.S., The District Collector Suryapet District.
Sri B. Srinivasulu, The Revenue Divisional Officer Huzurnagar Revenue AND Division Huzumagar, Suryapet District.
Smt. L. Manga, The Tahsildar Mattampalli Mandal Suryapet District. ...Respondents Couns6l for the Petitioner: Sri Vemula Suresh Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I , ?:. i< ,/ -,, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.3O92 of 2o25 DATE:. O5.12.2025 Between: Palvai Subhadra Sri Tejas Nandlal Pawar, I.A.S., and two others. AND .....Petitioner ....Respondents I ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 2l .O3.2O25 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8750 of2025.
2. This Court uide order dated 21.O3.2025 disposed of W.P.No.B7SO ol 2025, with the following directions: "6. [n uiew of the aboue submissions and since it is stated that te petitioner llcs alreadA made an application, d.ated. 02.03.2024 vide application No.24O0002466 for deletton of the subject property from the hst of prohibited properties, this Court deems it appropiate to dispose o/ ffus wit petition directing the respondents to examine the said application strictlg tn accordance uith tle prouisions of the Regtstration Act, 1908, taking into consid.eration of the doatments enclosed irr support of the said application and the assignment patta certijlcote granted in fauour of the uendor of the petitioner on 16.04.1977 and pass appropiate orders in accord.ance with la u.t and. comntltnicote the same to the petitioner uithin a penod of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In ang euent if the petitioter is trct entitled for deletion of the properties, the respondetlts are directe{l to pass a reasoned order and communicate the reaso,t.s thereon the petitioner. " cH^ oA vrJAyA ml,;l*y"H""^ EHASKAR REDDY D,o1;;92' rr'05 rB':seIe I \ 2
3. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue that in pursuance of the order dated 21.03.2025 passed by this Court, the respondents addressed a letter to the District Collector on 17.1O.2025 to conduct a detailed joint survey involving the Revenue, Forest and Survey Departments to clearly demarcate the boundaries between Forest, Revenue and dis-reserved lands in Survey No.540 of Pedaveedu Village, Mattampally Mandal.
Prima facie, it appears from the record that respondents have initiated action to carryout survey of the disputed lands and note down the physical features of the land to initiate further proceedings in compliance with the orders of this Court. Therefore, this Court is of the view that no case is made out to hold that the respondents have willfully or deliberately violated the order of this Court so as to invoke the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 197 l.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed Misceilaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- P.GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER One CC to Sri Vemula Suresh , Advocate [OPU Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for Hyderabad. [OUTI Two CD Copies e State of Telangana at To, 1 2 3 v> HIGH COURT CVBR, J DATED:0511212025 ORDER GC.No.3092 o12025 r, i)l!.t,':1 t l ,^ | 7f176 * I CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE [p
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.