District v. The Court made the following: ORDER
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
Cause title
of the Orders of the High Court dated 21-01-2025 passed in WP.No.15244 of 2O24. Between: Smt. P.Anitha, Wo. Vijender Reddy, aged about 57 years, Deputy Para Medical Officer, at O/o. The Additional Director of Leprosy (State Monitoring Cell), Directorate of Public Health and Family Welfare, Telangana Hyderabad now transferred at O/o. District Medical and Health Officer, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. ...Petitioner
Dr. B.Ravinder Nayak, Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Koti, Hyderabad' Telangana state' Counsel for the Petitioner:
Sri S. Gopal Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES I 1 The Court made the following:
ORDER ...
Respondent AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KAR'THIK .. CONTEMPI CASE No.1O84 of 2025 - ORDEB.i Allegin;3 willful disobedience of the order dated 21.01.2025 passed by this court in w.P.No. 15244 of 2024, and seeking to punish the contemnrlr/rr:spondent, this Contempt Case is hled.
when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleacler fr:r S,:rvices-I appearing on behalf of the sole respondent submits that in <:om1>liance with the order of this court dated 2l.ol.2o2s in w.P. No. 1524,1 of 2024, the respondent has passed a speaking order in Rt:.No.B(r8 /E l-A/2024 dated t7.O3.2025.
The above made submission is not seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. However, it is prayed to grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated LT.o3.2o2s. 4- Irr view of the above, this Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty as sourght for by the petitioner. Perrding miscellaneous petitions, if any, sha[ stand closed. No costs. s SD'-L LAKSHMI BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER /TRUE COPY'/
One CC to Sri S. Gopal Rao, Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to cC fOi SEnViCES I ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD CoPies ABK \ To, o i I i :l i \ HIGH COURT DATED :Z4t1Ot2O2S , / / D lr D ER CC.No.10A4 of 2025 THE L, * 1 ? irr Li lli,$ >i CLOSING THE CC 9oB
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.