Sadhupati Rama Rao v. T Chandra Sekhar Naidu
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the petition is closed recording the same. Accordingly, the petition is closed recording the same. 2 BSB, J CC.No.218 of 2025 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated…
Judgment
This petition is filed under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, petition is filed under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for his willful disobedience to the order passed in W.P.17751 of 2024 1971 for his willful disobedience to the order passed in W.P.17751 of 2024 1971 for his willful disobedience to the order passed in W.P.17751 of 2024 dated 09.09.2024.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.
The learned counsel for petitioner requested to close the petition as the The learned counsel for petitioner requested to close the petition as The learned counsel for petitioner requested to close the petition as relief is no more required.
Accordingly, the petition is closed recording the same. Accordingly, the petition is closed recording the same. 2 BSB, J CC.No.218 of 2025 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :20.02.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J CC.No.218 of 2025 30 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 218 of 2025 Date: 20.02.2025 GRL 4 BSB, J CC.No.218 of 2025
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Feb 2025. The bench was B S BHANUMATHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.