Contempt Case No. 88 of 2011 · High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 31 Jan 2012
- Bench
- NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Provisions considered
Judgment
None appears for the petitioner whereas the learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents has drawn my attention to the contents of the counter affidavit wherein it is specifically averred that the orders of this court have been faithfully and fully complied with. There is no material to controvert these statements. I do not consider that this is an appropriate case for proceeding against the respondents under the Contempt of Court’s Act. Hence, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. -------------------------------------------------- JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO 31st January 2012
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Court’s Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Jan 2012. The bench was NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.