✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 22 Oct 2010

Judgment · High Court · 2010

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Case at a glance

Decided
22 Oct 2010
Bench
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Outcome

Disposed of

With this, the writ petition stands disposed of at the stage of

Judgment

Operative part

Heard Mr. Harsha Kumar Astana, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. In support of his claim, the petitioner had, in fact, enclosed a copy of the Birth Certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, wherein the date of birth of the writ petitioner has been recorded as 21.01.1975. It appears as though that by sheer inadvertence, the entry relating to his date of birth in his passport bearing No.B 1760860 has been recorded as 03.02.1977. Such corrections being insignificant and inconsequential, they are required to be carried out upon being satisfied about the genuineness of the claim in that regard. In fact, this very question has been considered in great detail in WP No.19376 of 2007. By the judgment rendered on 21.09.2007, this Court directed the respondents to receive the application of the petitioner for making the necessary correction of the entries of the date of birth of the writ petitioner. In the facts and circumstances stated above, I direct the respondent to receive the application of the writ petitioner for making the necessary correction of entries of the date of birth from 03.02.1977 to 21.01.1975 and issue the revised or corrected passport within a further period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this, the writ petition stands disposed of at the stage of admission, but however, without costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J 22nd October 2010

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With this, the writ petition stands disposed of at the stage of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Oct 2010. The bench was NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments