M.Ratna Mohan Rao v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the petitioner:
Sri Venugopal Reddy Goddindla Counsel for respondents: --- The Court made the following:
ORDER:
A perusal of Annexure-I (list of events) would show that the petitioner has narrated facts, which are totally unconnected with the subject matter of the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded to this position. He, therefore, requests for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with proper list of events. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.28156 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th August, 2011 VGB
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.