P.Srinivasulu v. The District Collector, Chittoor District & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Having regard to the same, these writ petitions are allowed in
Judgment
Cause title
P.Srinivasulu And … Petitioner (W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
The District Collector, Chittoor District and another … Respondents (W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Sri Ch.Srinivas (W.P.No.25746 of 2009) Counsel for respondents: GP for Panchayat Raj (W.P.No.25746 of 2009) The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:
Operative part
In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners, who are Field Assistants, Technical Assistants, Computer Operators and Agriculturists, as the case may be, have questioned the notices demanding certain amounts towards alleged misappropriation of funds under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. At the hearing, it is agreed between the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Panchayat Raj appearing for the respective parties that the issues raised in these writ petitions are squarely covered by the judgment of this Court, dated 19.01.2011, in W.P.No.22984 of 2010 and batch. Having regard to the same, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the said judgment with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order. Date:20.01.2011 VGB
(C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Having regard to the same, these writ petitions are allowed in
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Jan 2011. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.