P.Gopal Rao & Anr. v. The State of Telangana, Igp gV its Pubtic prosecutor, High Court at

Sri,P. Gopal Rao, S/o. Rama Employee.R/o. Flat No.401, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. Smt.P.Sailaja, Wo. Gopal Rao, Aged 69 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o No.401, Maruthi Vasudeaa Residece 63/4 RT, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. Rao(Late), Aged 78 years, Occ. Retried Maruthi Vasudeaa Residece 6314 RT, Flat 2 ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

Smt. Lakkaraju Vijayalakshmi, Wo. L.D.P. Vittal( Late), age 60 years, Occ House Wife, R/o. Flat No. 101, Sai Datta Apartments, Vaibhav Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the criminal petition and quash C.C.No.1411 of 2018 on the file of the lV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioners. l.A. NO: 2OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of petitioners in C.C.No.'1411 of 2018 on the file of the lV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments -of Sri PRAIVIOD SINGH, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER INTHE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOFTEL/\ HYDE RABAD {GANA AT THE H ON'B LE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DE I1 EADA CRIMIN A L PETI TION No.10868 ot 202 Date:13. 02.2026 Between: P.Gopal Rao and another AND . petitioners The State of Telangana, Igp gV its Pubtic prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Telangana State and anotl rer ...Re spondents ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, it i,; 5ugm1tt.6 by the learned Additional public prosecutor, on i1;tructions, that during the pendency of this petition, the case a Tainst the petitioners i.e., C.C.No..t411 of 2Olg on the file of l:arned lV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyder: bad has ended in acquittal, and hence, this criminal petitic r filed for quashing of proceedings in the said C.C, hal; become infructuous. Recording the above submission, this criminal Iretition is dismissed as infructuous. Z Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. To, SD/- P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER "

1. The lV Addl. Chief Metiopolitan Magistrate' Hyderabad' Siiti""'Horse Ofi""i, potice Station, Amberpet, Malakpet Division. i ii 5. f*" bds to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4 o;; cc to sRl PRAMoD sINGH Advocate (oPUC) 5. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad (OUT) TPI(psl w FIIGH COURT DATED: 1310212026 t{c( C) C) t i 1 3 ''l tnr * lc r : ORDER CRLP.No.10868 ot 2023 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISI;ED AS INFRUCTUOUS 6 ,,'+ X..t