Baibar v. Rachakonda Rani
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased call for the records and quash the same in the proceedings in SC. No.441 of 2022 on the file of lll LRAT- Cum 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda District is liable to be quashed and pass l.A. NO: 2OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings SC. No.441 of 2022 on the file of lll LRAT- Cum 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda District is liable to be quashed and pass 7 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri ch Venkat Raman Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. The Corrt made the follow ng ORDER 'reffi:'}fiiE;F-r' ,/ '. ,/ ,/ ,/ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6780 ot 2O23 DATE OF
ORDER:
05.02.2026 Between Nagavelli Ranjith Kumar & another, ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 The State of Telangana & another AND .. Respondents ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 in S.C.No.441 of 2022, on the file of the learned Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum- I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420,376(2)(n) and 313 read with 34 of lPC.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the subject S.C.No.441 of 2022 ended in acquittal on 02.06.2025 and hence, t.,*# 2 the present Criminal Petition has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed 3 Recording the aforesaid submission the Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous
4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed Sd,- T.SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To
The lll LRAT- Cum lst Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda 2. The Station House Offlcer, Poice Station Subedari, Hanamakonda, Warangal 3. One CC to SRl. Ch Venkat Raman Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, At Hyderabad 5. Two CD Copies. EPR/BA HIGH COURT DATED:0510212026 ORDER CRLP.No.6780 of 2023 ,r'fos /,,;"' ,\) rr'.- !..) ) i 'a' i=r>u\ i ). ? 3 t:,:i lr:li r * Oc tt/l icf -u:D , +.J DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS a' , 1 ^ (,. ),1 7r
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 05 Feb 2026. The bench was TIRUMALA DEVI EADA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.