Venna Veera Reddy v. The District Cooperative Officer, Guntur (FAC), Guntur
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Counsel for t he Pet it ioner: MR.SHAIKKARIMUL L A Counsel COOPERAT ION t he Respondent No.: GP FOR T he Court made t he following : T HE HON’BL E Ms. JUST ICE G. ROHINI WRIT PET IT ION No. 18632 of 2008
Operative part
O R D E R: The petitioner herein, who is the President of the Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited, Nandirajupalem filed this writ petition seeking a declaration that the proceedings of the respondent dated 07-08-2008 ordering enquiry under Section 51 of the A.P. Co- operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act’) into the constitution, working and financial condition of the Society is arbitrary and illegal. The only contention raised by the petitioner is that since the proceeding are not based on the application of 1/3rd of the members of the committee or 1/5th of the total number of members of the society, it is impermissible to order the enquiry under Section 51 of the Act. I do not find any substance in the said contention since under Section 51 of the Act, the respondent is also competent to direct the enquiry suo moto. Though it is true that a representation was received alleging irregularities in the functioning of the Society from one P.Venkateswara Reddy-Director of the Society, a perusal of the impugned order shows that the enquiry was directed by the respondent on his own motion. Such order cannot be held to be erroneous on any ground whatsoever. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 27-08-2008 KL P
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Societies Act, 1964.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.