Mangayya v. District, Eluru
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Nov 2008
- Bench
- L NARASIMHA REDDY
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
1 The District Co-operative Officer, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. 3 The Kalla Large Sized Co-operative Society, Limited, Kalla, Kalla Mandal, West Godavari District Rep. by its Secretary. 4 Sri Ganisetti Chandra Sekhara Rao, S/o. Malleswara Rao, R/o. Kalla Kalla Mandal, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT
S Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein is not finalizing the proceedings under Section 60 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 against the 4th respondent herein pursuant to the common order dt. 31-10- 2006 passed by the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada in O.A.No. 122 and 123 of 2005 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of the Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and opposed to the very spirit and object of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, and the Rules framed thereunder and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to finalize the proceedings under Section 60 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 initiated against the 4th respondent herein pursuant to the common order dt. 31-10- 2006 passed by the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada in O.A.NO. 122 and 123 of 2005 by taking into consideration implead petition dated 24-9-2007 filed by petitioners herein and the Representation dt. 12-10-2007 submitted by the petitioners herein and pass such further order or orders as this Hon' ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERAT ION The Court made the following: T HE HON'BLE MR JUST ICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.22443 of 2007
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the developments that have taken place subsequent to filing of the Writ Petition, no orders are necessary. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 6th November 2008 RRB
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 — s. 60; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 — s. 60.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 06 Nov 2008. The bench was L NARASIMHA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.