✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 15 Feb 2007

D.Ambedkar Kumar v. The Joint Registrar/District Cooperative Officer, Machilipatnam, Krishna District & Ors.

W.P No. 19362 of 2003L NARASIMHA REDDY2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
15 Feb 2007
Bench
L NARASIMHA REDDY

Judgment

The petitioner states that he is one of the Directors of Vijaya Bhaskara Cooperative Collecting Farming Society Limited, Puligadda, Avanigadda Mandal, the sixth respondent herein. He states that the society comprised of 56 members and that the Government had allotted Acs.56.46 cents to enable the members to undertake collective cultivation. It is stated that with the collusion of some of the members of the society in control of administration, some non-members have encroached into the lands allotted to the society and even after this Court held in W.P.No.19362 of 2003 to the effect that the admission of such members into the society is contrary to law, they are still in possession and enjoyment of the land. It is stated that the Divisional Cooperative Officer, the second respondent herein, addressed a letter, dated 29.12.2006, to the Station House Officer, the fourth respondent herein, for taking necessary steps for removal of encroachments and he complains that no action has been taken thereon. The petitioner seeks appropriate directions in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Had it been a dispute between the Society and its members or the members inter se, there would have been a possibility for the petitioner to avail the remedy under Section 61 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. The land belonging to the society is said to be in possession of non-members. Therefore, the society as well as the authority, which allotted the land i.e. the District Collector, the fifth respondent herein, are under obligation to ensure that such illegal encroachments are removed forthwith. This Court is of the view that the letter addressed by the second respondent to the fourth respondent cannot lead to any legal consequences. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, directing the

first respondent i.e. the Joint Registrar/District Cooperative Officer, Krishna District and the District Collector, Krishna at Machilipatnam, the fifth respondent, to take necessary steps in accordance with law for removal of the encroachments in the land allotted to the sixth respondent-society, within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________

15.02.2007

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 — s. 61.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Feb 2007. The bench was L NARASIMHA REDDY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. W.P No. 19362 of 2003). ← Search more judgments