✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 02 Nov 2006

B.Vijaya v. The Prudential Cooperative Bank Ltd., Rep., by its Managing Director

W.P No. 10648 of 2004C V RAMULU2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
02 Nov 2006
Bench
C V RAMULU

Outcome

Disposed of

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly

Judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.10648 of 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent discriminating the petitioner in applying the interest rates contrary to guide lines contemplated Banking Regulatory Acts, especially Section 21 of the Act, as arbitrary and illegal. It appears that the petitioner initially secured a loan of Rs.3,00,000/- subjecting her property to mortgage, and on failure to repay the same, respondent initiated proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. It is her case that the respondent being registered one under the AP Cooperative Societies Act, doing business for all practical purposes, they are bound by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 particularly, they shall adhere to Section 21 of the Banking Regulation Act. Respondent charged interest more than 22% for its customers, on loan advance, compared to other banks, whose maximum interest is 18% p,a.

This sort of discrimination in awarding the rate of interest by respondent is highly illegal and excessive in view of the standard rate declared by the Reserve Bank of India. The proceedings issued by the arbitrator under OP No.120 of 2001 attained finality. Thereafter, the petitioner deposited 2% of the loan amount under one time settlement scheme. Since the rate of interest calculated by the respondent was very high, discriminatory and, the petitioner was not in a position to pay the amount at all. Under those circumstances, the demand notices under Rule 52 (ii) (e) of Rules of the AP Cooperative Societies Act, for an amount of Rs.10,46,091/- along with interest at 22%, and again, for an amount of Rs.11,06,000/- along with interest at the rate of 23% were issued on 30.4.2004. That itself shows that respondent has not followed the standard measures of rate of interest, and also the prescribed guide lines.

Operative part

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for charging lesser interest taking into consideration the guidelines issued by Reserve Bank of India from time to time and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. _________ 02-11-2006 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.10648 of 2004 Dated:02.11.2006

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; AP Cooperative Societies Act.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Nov 2006. The bench was C V RAMULU.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. W.P No. 10648 of 2004). ← Search more judgments