M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd v. Mr Deepak Chowdary
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK ARADHE, WSTICE
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of aforesaid joint submissions and for the reasons assigned in the said order dated 18.12.2024 passed in I.T.T.A.No.136 of 2008, the substantial question of law is alswered in tJ,e negative and against the assessee. In the result, the appeal fails and is…
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Appellant
Mr Deepak Chowdary Rep. M/s CKR Associates Counsel for the Respondent :
Mr J V Prasad Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Departrnent The Court delivered the following Judgment : l i I I I I ; THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTIC E ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE J.SR.EENTVAS RAO INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No .135 of 2OO8
JUDGMENT:
(Per tlrc Hon ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. Deepak Chowdary, learned counsel representing M/s. CKR Associates for the appellant. Mr. J.V.Prasad, Iearned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for the respondent.
This appeal under Sectio n 260A of the lncome Tax Act, 196t has been frled against the order dated 2g.O2.2OOT passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B' in I.T.A.No.496/Hyd/2OO4. The subject marter of the appeal pertains to assessment year 2000_0 l.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the question of law involved in this appeal has been alswered b,y this Court by an order dated I g. 12 .2024 passed in I.T.T.A.No. 1 36 of 2008. ,,
In view of aforesaid joint submissions and for the reasons assigned in the said order dated 18.12.2024 passed in I.T.T.A.No.136 of 2008, the substantial question of law is alswered in tJ,e negative and against the assessee. In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby - 5. t dismissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall starrd closed. fhere shall be no order as to costs. /ITRUE COPY/' A.V.S.S.C.S.M. JorNrFG SARMA ISTRAR I ('\ SECTION OFFICER To,
The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of Incorne Tax, (Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 3(4), Hyderabad 4. One CC to Mr J V Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax . Department [OPUC] 5. One CC to M/s CKR Associates, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies VA/gh Kt, HIGH COURT DATED:0210112025 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.135 of 2008 : i I I I I ; I I I I I I 1 I r4E S fA r€ ,o 2q Jfitl * l)SS"n ( t 7 c f,+ a DISMISSING THE ITTA .dd a 9:s,
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.