✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 10 Mar 2006

Joint Collector & Additional Magistrate, Nizamabad v. Smt.M.shyama Sundaramathi

Writ Petition No. 8836 of 1994B PRAKASH RAO

Case at a glance

Decided
10 Mar 2006
Bench
B PRAKASH RAO

Outcome

Allowed

prior to the Act coming into force, the review application is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Smt.M.shyama Sundaramathi. And two others. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO ...RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NO.8836 of 1994 And Review W.P.M.P.No.20917 of 2004 COMMON ORDER: The only question involved in this review is as to the competency for cancellation of any Caste Certificate under the…

Judgment

Smt.M.shyama Sundaramathi. AND

1. Joint Collector & Additional Magistrate, Nizamabad. And two others. AND Review W.P.M.P.No.20917 of 2004 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT Between: Joint Collector & Additional Magistrate, Nizamabad. ...REVIEW PETITIONER AND

Operative part

1.

Smt.M.shyama Sundaramathi. And two others. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO ...RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NO.8836 of 1994 And Review W.P.M.P.No.20917 of 2004 COMMON ORDER: The only question involved in this review is as to the competency for cancellation of any Caste Certificate under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Communities) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (16 of 1993) (‘the Act’ for brevity). There is no dispute to the fact that in the present case, the Joint Collector concerned passed the order on 20.07.1992. However, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the review applicant submits that the said Act 16/1993 came into force w.e.f. 15.06.1997 interpreting the said provisions but not earlier. This Court has taken a view that the Collector of the District alone is competent to cancel any caste certificate but not the District Revenue Officer under the provisions of the Act. Having regard to the same and in view of the error apparent on the face of the record that the Joint Collector passed order of cancellation on 20.07.1992, which is much prior to the Act coming into force, the review application is allowed. Consequently, Writ Petition No.8836 of 1994 stands dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 10th March 2006 RRB

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: prior to the Act coming into force, the review application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Mar 2006. The bench was B PRAKASH RAO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8836 of 1994). ← Search more judgments