Eruventi Balshetty v. R./o. Telkapalli Village , Nagarkurnool
Judgment
Cause title
(Writ Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common Order dated 02/05/2008 in WP NO : 5617, 9094, 9095, 9106 & 9107 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) W.P.NO.1415 OF 2008
Between: Eruventi Balshetty S/o. Venkataiah R./o. Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 K. Raghavendra S/o. Lakshmaiah R./o. Telkapalli Village , Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 The District Collector, (Panchayat Wing) Mahabubnagar District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nagarkurnool, Mahabubnagar District. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Nagarkurnool, Rep. by its Sarpanch, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1416 of 2008 Between: Eruventi Balshetty S/o.Venkataiah R/o.Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 K.Uma Devi D/o.Lakshmaiah R/o.Telkapalli Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 The District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Mahabubnagar District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nagarkurnool, Mahabubnagar District. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Telkapally Village & Mandal, Nagarkurnool, rep. by its Sarpanch, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1418 of 2008 Between: Eruventi Balshetty, S/o. Venkataiah, R/o. Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 K. Srikanth, S/o. Lakshmaiah, R/o. Telkapalli Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 The District Collector, ( Panchayat Wing ), Mahaboobnagar. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nagarkurnool, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Telkappaly, Nagarkurnool, Rep. by its Sarpanch, Mahaboobnagar Dist …RESPONDENTS
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1421 of 2008 Between: Eruventi Balshety, S/o. Venkataiah, R/o. Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 K.Geetha Lakshmi, W/o. V.Shyam Sunder, R/o. Telkapalli Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 The District Collector, (Panchayat Wing) Mahabubnagar District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nagar Kurnool, Mahabubnagar District. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Telkapally Village & Mandal, Nagar Kurnool, Rep by its Sarpanch, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1426 of 2008 Between: Eruventi Balshetty S/o.Venkataiah R/o.Telkapalli Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 K.Nagesh S/o.Lakshmaiah R/o.Telkapalli Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 The District Collector (Panchayat Wing) Mahabubnagar District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nagarkurnool, Mahabubnagar District. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Telkapally village & Mandal, Nagarkurnool, rep. by its Sarpanch, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI K.SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A.NARASIMHA REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEALS NO : 1415, 1416, 1418, 1421 AND 1426 of 2008
COMMON JUDGMENT:
(per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The above writ appeals have been preferred by the appellant questioning the common order, dated 2.5.2008 in WP No.5617 of 2008 and batch. The appellant herein is a third party and he filed the above writ appeals with the leave of the Court. When these appeals are taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the issue involved in all the appeals are squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.A.No:1474 of 2008, dated 3.2.2009. Recording the above submission, all the appeals are disposed of in terms of judgment, dated 3.2.2009 in W.A.1474 of 2009. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Dated: 3.2.2009 Nn. ___________________________ Justice C.V. Nargarjuna Reddy THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEALS NO : 1415, 1416, 1418, 1421 AND 1426 of 2008 (Common Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 3rd February, 2009
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.