Andhra Vidhyabhivardhini Sangam v. The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature…
Judgment
Sri Bhogeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Matwada, Warangal.
Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned order in I.A.No.72/2000 in O.A.No.150/1999 on 16- 01-2003 ignoring the vested rights acquired by the petitioner- sangam under the provisions of Abolition of Inams Act and ignoring the interim direction given by the Inams Tribunal in R.C.No.D/5229/2002, dated 07-12-2002 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, intentional and without any authority and consequently set aside the same as illegal. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD , Advocate Counsel for the Respondents 1,2 and 4 : . GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR ENDOWMETNS. Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr. Ravi Kondaveti The Court Made the Following : Oral Order: Heard both sides. Petitioner-Sangam, which is in possession of land, is running the school from the year 1945 onwards by obtaining a registered lease deed and continued to run the same ever after abolition of Inams under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’). It is stated that the petitioner made a claim under Section 9 of the Act to grant Occupancy Certificate in its favour where every private building, situated within an inam shall, with effect from the date of vesting, vest in the person who owned it immediately before the said date. Admittedly, 1st proviso to Section 4 of the Act do not prohibit granting of Occupancy Certificate over the building covered under Section 9 of the Act. In view of the same, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal—1st respondent is hereby directed to pass final orders in O.A.No.150 of 1999 keeping in view of the above provisions. Pending passing final orders in O.A. the interim order granted by this Court that petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/- per month and on such deposit the 3rd respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing any security shall continue. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 22-06-2004 Murthy A.GOPAL REDDY, J. ASSITANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To
The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Wanrangal.
Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal.
Nagavarapu Amruthamma died per single Trustee, Sri Bhogeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Matwada, Warangal. 4. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad. 5. 2CCs to Govt. Pleader for Endowmttns. (OUT) 6.2 CDs.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Abolition of Inams Act; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Jun 2004. The bench was A GOPAL REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.