✦ Telangana High Court · 15 Apr 2026

RELAX WELL BEAUTY AND SPA v. The State of Telangana

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. It is submitted by the tearrred counscl fo. the petiLioners in all the Writ Petitions and learned Government Pleader for Homc that the entire batch of these Wnt Pctitions can bc disposed o[ in terrns of interim order dated O4.O2 2O2L in I.A.No. I…

Judgment

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI REVELLI RAMANJANEYUT- , Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE TIIGH COTJRT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.ll352 of 2026 DATE:15.04.2026 Between: M/s. Relax Well Beauty and SPA. AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana,, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, TS Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad and 3 others. ...Respondents ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking following relief "...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the action of Respondents Police Officials and Officers of SOT in interfering with lawful business of petitioner shops under the guise of impugned notification No.(L&O)/Ma/ 314012010, dated 30.06.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent and forcing the petitioners to secure similar orders from this Honourable Court as passed in W.P.No.16281 of 2010 and batch though there is no violation committed by the petitioners in running their 2 SPA, Wellness Centre as arbitrary illc 3 I and unconstihrtional and violative of Articles 14, l!( l(g) of the Constitution of India and direct the responr ots and their otficers not to interfere in the day to day br s ness of petitioncr shops ..."

#2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on ror ord and learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home. perused th: record.

#3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing solutions for all beauty and wellness needs such as saloon and spa. The petitior cr is holding a valid registration certificate for running the business :r the name and style of M/s. Relax Well Beauty and SpA. 3'1' He further submits that the grievance of the p:ritioner is that basing on the impugned notification issued by the (t, ,rnrnissioner of Police, the Police are frequentty interfering with thc rusiness of the petitioner and forcing the petitioner to close the said Ir Lsiness without following any due procedure of law.

3.2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in similar set ol facts and circumstances, batch of writ petitions have been filed before this Court and this Court, disposed : " the said writ 3 petitions vide Common Order, dated 28.09.2021, in W.P.Nos'16281 of 2010 and batch. Stating so, leamed counsel for the petitioner would seek to pass appropriate orders.

#4. Leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home has not disputed the fact of disposal ofthe batch ofcases.

#5. In view of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Common Order, dated 28.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16281 of 2010 and batch, directing the petitioner to obtain necessary permission and license from the concemed Municipal authorities. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shalt stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-T.SREENIVAS REDDY SISTANT REGIST SECTION OFFICER Telangana, TG-500004.

#1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, T.S riat, Hyderabad, State of 2. The commissioner of Police, Nialkajgiri commissionerate, Ramakn'shnapuram Post, Shiva Nagar Colony, Vayupuri, Neredmet, Secunderabad, Tetangana 500056

#3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, ACp L.B. Nagar Division, LB Nagar - Uppal Rd, Central Bank Colony, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500074 4. Station House Officer, Nagole Police Station, 2-1-51. Road No.2, Venkata Ramana Colony, Marnatha Nagar, Nagole, Hyderabad, Telangana 50006g 5. One CC to SRI REVELLI RAMANJANEYULU, Advocate tOpUCI 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] 1 T To (Along with a copy of the common order passed in Wp.No.16281 of 201O and batch, dated 28.09.2021) PSK. o HIGH COURT DATED: 1510412026 ORDER WP.No.11352 of 2026 J l,1l f iO l.J a.l [?t liffi i'/ ,{ 'r- _-"'-'\ * ,2, '-j DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \+ I TIIE HONOURABLE SEU JUSTTCE I<.LAKSIrMAN qrRIT PETITION Nos.16281 aud 16419 of 2O1 79'f L23L 18'16a .2272of2OL4 3O317 of 2O15 15413 l5 435. 29229.29 231 30848. 33121. 3alu)9. 21()73 8 4O7E7 and, 44939 of 2OL6 646 65a 2955 3407 11o51 20069 2590I 24920 4LOL2 4L328 41355 and 41422 of 2OL7 3482 17249 26367 26a22 34474 35307 38617 39397 399 L'f 39937 44044 44067 45592 and 4565a of 2O 18 2627 4399 3891 4447 laa6l L9352 20036 21909 2t924 21930 227@ 23794 24674 2641O 29 LO7 aod, 29L2L of 2Ol9 347 708 1aE7 L906 3549 4728 5374 200a9 20443 2r297 22334 22544 22629 24080 24041 24o85 24334 24357 214]o. 2445L 244s9,24560.24462 L!4 24=73 or 2o2o; 2482 3361 4473 44aA 6595 66t4 ao50 1301o 1L225 11350 L4562 16431 20'134 2275L 2276L 22764 22815 23031,2!861 aad ?3a22 ot2O2L COMMON ORDER: Sincc the issue invotved in all these Writ Petitions is one ald thc sane, they are being disposed of by this common o rder

#2. It is submitted by the tearrred counscl fo. the petiLioners in all the Writ Petitions and learned Government Pleader for Homc that the entire batch of these Wnt Pctitions can bc disposed o[ in terrns of interim order dated O4.O2 2O2L in I.A.No. I of 2020 in W.P.No.2441O ot 2O2O. 3- In view of the submissions of learncd counsel for both sides, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of ordcr daied o4.o2.202 t in I.A.No. L ot 2020 in w. P. No.244 lO of 2O20, permitting tfre petitioners to run the massage centrcs, subject to maintaining a record in thc register to bc rnaintained by the massage centres contaroieg ttre dates of visits of the customers, their names and vcrit-rable addresses togethcr with the phone nurnbers, so as to enable the poticc to contact thern on thc aspect of the r( luest to thc owner/ managcr/ opcrator of the rnassage ccrt es to provide for the help from thc oppositc scx. Further, it :r] all be open to ary policc ofltccr nol bclow thc rarlk of a :S -r r -[nspector o[ Policc attachecl to any poltcc station to verify' I r,;e in a whilc such records maintained [>y the massage cenrrc ; and tre shall also bc at liberty to verify as to whettrer- he particular customer iras solicited any such special ser i.- from thc massa€lc ccntre or not. [t is also open to thc ),)[ice to takc appropriatc acLion dcpending upon the rcsu t r)[ any such verification and also consiclcrhg the lact tlurt whether the cross massage service Jtrovidcd to the cus cmers is rn pro[cssional matlncr or not. Police are al; entitted to investigate into crimes, i[ any, reported i€airrst petrtioncrs Pctitioncrs arc also directed not t{) [ 3ep ttre mdn door o[ thc prcmises closed, during the u r 1<ing hours. Subjcct to thcse conditions, the pet-itioners may t,e perrnitted to carry on thc busincss, duly taking.all necess.r y and proper precautions to ensure that no incident o[ imrnc .a] aetivity is ca-r.ried on under the guisc of providing whole tr dy rnassagc- Miscellaneous petitions pcnding in all the \l/r r peLitions, i[ any, strzLll st:rnd closed. Ttrcrc shall be no ord<:r s to costs- Datc; 28.09 .2021 TJMR K. I.i KSHMAN, J

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Telangana High Court, on 15 Apr 2026. The bench was K I I KSHMAN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. W. P No. 16281 of 2010). ← Search more judgments