Fishermen Cooperative Society, Komarabanda v. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Jun 2004
- Bench
- GHULAM MOHAMMED
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in issuing proceedings No.A2/9846/93, dated 21-05-1994 in directing the Respondent-4 fishing operations departmentally and consequential memo of Respondent No.4 issued in his proceedings No.617/B/93, dated 22-05-1993 directing the Inspector of Fisheries, Suryapet to conduct fishing operations departmentally as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 while issuing a consequential direction to the respondents that the petitioner society is entitled to conduct fishing operations in the Ura Cheruvu Tank with the necessary assistance and cooperation from the respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner:
Mr. Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, Advocate for MR. D.GOVARDHANACHARY For the Respondents: G.P. for Panchayat Raj The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Operative part
Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, Advocate, representing the counsel for petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda.
Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District.
Circle Inspector of Police, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District.
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda.
Two CCs to G.P for Panchayat Raj, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
Two CD copies. *Nsr/kk
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Jun 2004. The bench was GHULAM MOHAMMED.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.