✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 01 Aug 2005

The Prudential Cooperative Bank Ltd v. A.P.Cooperative Tribunal & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 11072 of 2000V V S RAO

Case at a glance

Decided
01 Aug 2005
Bench
V V S RAO

Outcome

Allowed

Following the same, the Writ Petition is allowed modifying the impugned

Judgment

Operative part

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11072 OF 2000 ORDER: The Prudential Cooperative Bank Limited, Secunderabad, assails the order of the A.P.Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad insofar as the same reduces rate of interest on the amount payable from 16.5% to 6% per annum. Be it noted, that the appeal was filed by borrowers assailing the certificate issued by competent authority under Section 71 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (for short, the Act). The certificate as such was confirmed, but rate of interest was reduced. A learned Single Judge of this Court (Goda Raghuram, J) in A.P.State Cooperative Bank Ltd. V. Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, considered the issue whether Cooperative Tribunal is empowered to invoke and rely on the provisions of Section 34 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to scale down the interest contrary to the agreement between parties. His Lordship after elaborate discussion of the issue, held that the Cooperative Tribunal constituted under Section 75 of the Act is denuded of any such power to interfere with rate of interest that is owed by a debtor to company like petitioner. The question raised in this Writ Petition is therefore squarely covered by said judgment. The learned counsel for contesting respondents does not dispute the legal position. Following the same, the Writ Petition is allowed modifying the impugned order and further observing that petitioner bank shall be entitled to recover the interest from the borrowers as per the award/certificate issued by competent authority under the Act. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed. _______________

(V.V.S.RAO, J)

1.8.2005

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the same, the Writ Petition is allowed modifying the impugned

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 — s. 71; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 34.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 01 Aug 2005. The bench was V V S RAO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 11072 of 2000). ← Search more judgments