Principal Commissioner of uuards, Masabtank, nrr..'ilrt31e0oTax-1, 7th Floor, A-Block, l.T.Towers, A. c v. Sri Siva Kartikeya
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordlngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. b. DUgh I 1tre STA I6f ( ( ] C) i t o o 31 i[tt 2[?5 * ce i;PAI Cts p'(\ HIGH COURT DATED:06/0'll2O25 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.72 of 2O21 APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Judgment
Cause title
UNAL APPE AL NO Appear fired under section 260-A of the rncome Tax Act, 1g6.1 against the Order dated 17.12.2019 passed in t.T.A.No. 334Al zoo4-os on the fite of the tncome rax Appe, ate i1r::::f;ffiil::H1 preferred against the order dated 30,03.2016 passed in rrA Nos277/Crr(A)- 1lGNTl2O11-12 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) _ .1, Guntur prefened against the As No AAG FA5343Q on the,,=T:IJJ,:I #T,:ffi :1":"#:T:.':.:# Circle - 2(1),Guntur. Between: Principal Commissioner of uuards, Masabtank, nrr..'ilrt31e0oTax-1, 7th Floor, A-Block, l.T.Towers, A. c. AND ...Appellant
ffilffi fl#i:3,:#eX'.:fl ::?:.,;.;l#SSl"i,y"l"";,&i&,yft ::swariMekins counse, ror the Appet'ant ...Respondents
##:1,r. xT$l:":!fi :H::1""*"1l;"' Counsel for the Respondent :Sri A V A Siva Kartikeya The Court delivered the following: / THE HON ,BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE J.SREENIVAS RAO INCOME I
JUDGMENT:
Ce' the Hon'ble the Chief Justice AIok Aradhe) ( Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel representing Mr. J'V'Prasad, Iearned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for the appellant.
Learnerl counsel for the appellant seeks leave o[ this Court to witl-rdraw the appeal in the light of the Circular No.O9 12024, dated 17.09.2O24, with the liberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of the appeai falls in any of the e;<ceptions provided in the Circular No':il2024 dated 15.O3.12024.
Operative part
Accordlngly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the libertY as PraYed for' u 2 Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall \ stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO J NT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - 1, Guntur. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle - 2(1),Guntur One CC to One CC to Mr. J.V. Prasad Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax Department [OpUC] One CC to Sri A V A Siva Kartikeya, Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies > \ To, 1 2 3 4
b. DUgh I 1tre STA I6f ( ( ] C) i t o o 31 i[tt 2[?5 * ce i;PAI Cts p'(\ HIGH COURT DATED:06/0'll2O25 JUDGMENT lTTA.No.72 of 2O21 APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.