Criminal Petition No. 2324 of 2026 · Telangana High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the crirninal petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the crirninal petition is disposed of. Penrling miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER I I //TRUE COPY// To,
Judgment
3-46, Sriramnagar, Khanapur, Nirmal Diskict, Telangana.
4. Sattu Narsinga rao @ Jashuva D/o. Mondaiah, Age. 65 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. H No 1-3-132183, Shastri Nagar, Khanapur, Nirmal District, Telangana-504203. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 2 to 5 AND
The State of Telangana, Rep., by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad.
Thati Prashanthi, Wo Someshwar, Age.29 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. Gangapuri, Manthani Mandal, Peddapalli District, Telangana, Cel. 9666347090 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 5 in cc- No. 222 of 2025 on the file of the court of the principal Judicial Magistrate First-Class at Manthani_ l.A. NO: 2 OF 2 26 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased t: direct stay of all proceedings against the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 5 in cc. No. 222 of 2o25 on the file of the court of the principal Judicial Magistrate First-Class at Manthani till the disposal of the euash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of lriminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Alluri Divakar Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court marle the following: ORDER H F AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2324 of 2026 Date:20.02.2026 Between: Govindu Sujatha and three others AND The State of Telangana, Rep., by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad and another ...Petitioner ORDER .Respondents This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos'2 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.222 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Manthani. 2, Heard Mr. Alluri Divakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2.
Though the Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the 1 t proceedings in C.C.No.222 of 2025, the learned counsel for the petitioners has restricted his prayer and requested this Court to dispense with the appearance of the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 5 in C'C.No.222 \- -- 2 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Manthani.
Tl-re learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submissicns rnade by the learned counsel for petitioner.
[n vierv of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion cn the merits of the case, the presence of the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 5 in C.C.No.222 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Judicial lMagistrate of First Class, at Manthani, is dispensed with, subiect tcr the condition that they shall be represented through their counsel on each and every date of hearing. If the presence of the petitionersr is required, they shall appear before the trial Court. In case of their non-appearance on the specific date fixed by the trial Court for their appearance, the trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter, in accordancr: with [aw.
Operative part
Accordingly, the crirninal petition is disposed of. Penrling miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER I I //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Principal Judicial First Class lt/a(istrate at Manthani 2. The Station House Officer, ftIanthani Police Station, Peddapalli District 3. Two CCs tc the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] I I I I I I i I
4. One CC to Sri Alluri Divakar Reddy' Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CD CoPtes VH/PSL 4[-, HIGH COURT DATED: 2010212026 \ t ITA, 't o C) 25 FE I I )s .,Y r=li c LP.No.2324 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the crirninal petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 20 Feb 2026. The bench was SREENIVAS RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.