Shree Samarath Kamadhenu Gowshala, Opp. GHMC Colony. Shiva Bagh, Jiyaguda, Puranapul, Hyderabad v. The State of Telangana

the records the impugned orders in CRL.M.P.NO.415 OF 2026 lN FIR NO. 80 OF 2026 dated. .24-04-2026 quash the proceedings on the file of the XVll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 2OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned orders in CRLMP. NO. 415 OF 2026 lN FIR NO. 80 OF 2026 daled. 24-04-2026 on the file of the XVll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Syed Hameed, Advocate for Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER i Y7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENWAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7384 of 2o26 Date: 05.O5.2O26 Between Shree Samarath Kamadhenu Gowshala, Opp. GHMC Colony. Shiva Bagh, Jiyaguda, Puranapul, Hyderabad, Rep by its Sevak Sri Purushotham Guptha AND ... Petitioner/ 3.d party The State of Telangana Through S.H.O P.S.Golkonda, Hyderabad, Rep. By its F\rblic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and anot.her. Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition has been filed aggrieved by the order, dated 24.04.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.4I5 of 2026 in FIR No.8O of 2026, on the file of XVII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad.

Heard Mr. G.L.Narisimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Syed Hameed, Iearned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1 .

Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a Shree Samarth Kamadhenu Gowshala. The learned trial Court 2 without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner allowed the application in Crl-M.P.No.415 of 2026. The petitioner is an effected party and will be put to great hardship, unless the impugned order is set aside and he requests this Court to direct the learned trial Court to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.

Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that though petitioner was arrayed as a party respondent ald petitioner has not diligently prosecuted the matter before the trial Court, as such the learned trial Court has rightly allowed the said application. Hence, the petitioner is not entitled to seek relief as sought in the present criminal petition.

Having considered submissions made by both the respective parties and after perusal of material available on record, it reveals that the learned trial Court has not given an opportunity to the petitioner before allowing the application on 24.O4 .2026. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that if one opportunity is given to the petitioner to put forth-with his grievance before the trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.415 of 2026, no prejudice would be caused to respondent No.2.

Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order, dated 24.04.2026 passed by the learned trial Court in Crl. M. P. No.4 15 of 2026 is set aside and the *r"*r--7 ,/ 3 learned trial Courl is directed to dispose of the application Crl.M.P.No.4 i 5 of 2026, afresh after giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as respondent No.2. In view of the urgency expressed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the trial Court shall dispose of the application within a period of one week from the date of receipt o[ a copy of this order. It is needles to state that both the parties shail cooperate with the trial Court for disposal of the application uide CrI.M.P .No.4 I 5 of 2026, without seeking undue adjournments.

Accordingly, tiiis criminal petition is allowed Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The XVll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Golconda Police Station, Hyderabad 3. One CC to Sri GL.Narasimha Rao ,Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana (OUT) 5. Two CD Copies Ks/GNK Va- € 1 HE 514rt ( 15 HAY I 2 * r5PAT CB * HIGH COURT DATED: 0510512026 ORDER CRLP.No.7384 of 2026 Allowing the Crl.P. % toP@ 3d-