D. Susheel Kumar v. Hindustan petroleum Corporation Ltd, Hindustan Bhavan, LPG Division
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Jul 2023
- Bench
- SREENIVAS RAO
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WR lT PETITION NO: 11076 OF 2003 Between: D. Susheel Kumar, S/o D. Raja Rathnam F/o 20-65/,4., Kodand Ramnagar' Saroornagar, Dilsukhnagar, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONER
AND '1 . The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai rep. by its Director ,Marketing J
2. Hindustan petroleum Corporation Ltd, Hindustan Bhavan, LPG Division, rep.by its General Manager, Cherlapally, R.R. District. ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari call for records in relation and in connection with impugned proceedings daled 27-11-2OO1 issued by the 2nd respondent discharging the petitioner from service as confirmed by the proceeding dated 2O-O2-20O2 issued by the l"trespondent on appeal and quash. Counsel for the Petitioner:
Smt. K. UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondents: Smt. A.V.S. LAXMI The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.11076 of 2OO3
ORDER:
Operative part
When the nlatter is tal<en up for hearing, Smt. K- Uday Sri, learned counsel .rppearing frrr the petitioner submits that in spite of her best efforts, she did not receive any instructions from the petitioner to prosecute the u,rit petition. In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cosls Miscellaneous applical ior-rs, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD ASSTSTA2ILREGISTRAR sEcrE-N oFFlcER / //TRUE COPY// UDAYA SRl, Advocate [OPUC] V.S. LAX|Ml. Advocate [OPUC] To,
One CC to Sm 2. One CC to Sm 3. Two CD Copie BN G2e t,K tA S { HIGH COURT DATED:1 210712023 I I ORDER J WP.No.11076 of 2003 u€ lr )e \. ir 1 [Ut] ?Un \ I I t,, : l, -: i-' 1 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS \r> 2\ T\
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 12 Jul 2023. The bench was SREENIVAS RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.