✦ Court unavailable · 11 Dec 2018

Yendluri Ramaiah v. Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3

Civil Revision Petition No. 4104 of 2009N BALAYOGI3 min read

Judgment

Cause title

3. Bethapudi Sarabhaiah, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawbda-3.

4. Bethapudi Mallikharjuna Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, SarabhaiahgariGullu, Durgapuram, Vi.jayawada-3.

5. Bethapudi Srinivas, S/o. Koteswararao, Trustee, Sri Durga lvlalleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3. ...Respondents

Whereas the Petitioner above named through his Advocate SRI P.R. Prasad, presented this petition Under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the orders of the ll Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Dated : 26-06-2009 in l.A.No. 157 ol 2OOg in O.S.No. 1623 oI 2007.. And whereas the High Court, upon perusing the petition and the memo of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of P.R. Prasad, Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of Fresh notice to the Respondents herein relurnable in two weeks to show cause why this petition should not be admttted. You viz : l.Jyosula Bramarambha, Wo. Lakshminarasim ha IVlurthy, Rlo.24-18-49, Sarabhaiahgiri Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

2. Sri Durga malleswara Devasthanam Private Family Trust, represented by its Present Trustees and Managing Trustees, Durgapuram, Vijayawada -3, Krishna District.

3. Bethapudi Sarabhaiah, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3, Krishna District. 4. Bethapudi tt/allikharjuna Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, SarabhaiahgariGullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3.

5. Bethapudi Srinivas, S/o. Koteswararao, Trustee, Srl Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3, Krishna District. are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in this petition and the memo of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this Civil Revision Petition should not be admitted. The Court made the following

ORDER:-

"The track record shows that notices was served on respondent No.2. lssue fresh notice to respondent No.1 returnable in two weeks. Counsel for petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice on respondent No.1 by registered post acknowledgement due and file proof of service. Post after two weeks. " // TRUE COPY // sdi- N. cHANRASEK{AR RAO, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR & for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Contd.2.. . 2- 1 .Jyosula Bramarambha, Wo. Lakshminarasimha Murthy, R/o. 24-18-49, Sarabhaiahgiri Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

2.

Sri Durga malleswara Devasthanam Private Family Trust, represented by its Present Trustees and Managing Trustees, Durgapuram, Vijayawada -3, Krishna Drstrict.

3.

Bethapudi Sarabhaiah, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3, Krishna District.

4.

Bethapudi Mallikharjuna Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Trustee, Sri purga Malleswara Devasthanam, SarabhaiahgariGullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3.

5.

Bethapudi Srinivas, S/o. Koteswararao, Trustee, Sri Durga Malleswara Devasthanam, Sarabhaiahgari Gullu, Durgapuram, Vijayawada-3, Krishna District. (Addressee Nos. 1 to 5 BY RPAD along with a copy of Petition and Memo of Grounds)

6.

Qne CC to P.R. Prasad, Advocate(OPUC)

7.

One spare copy. TKK Note :- The C.R.P. No. 4104 of 2018 is corrected as C.R.P.no. 4104 ol 2009. Substitute this corrected order in place of prevrous order which was already dispatched on 03-01- 2019. SdA N. PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR HIGH COURT NBY.J DATED: 11-12-2018. (AMENDED ORDER) FRESH NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION LL ,il '' v , ,: ,\' It '"*u E CRP.No. 4104 of 2009 +

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Petition No. 4104 of 2009). ← Search more judgments