The High Court · 2025

2- Srnt.T. K.Sridevi,, Cornrnissionerand Directorof Municipal.Adrninistration, State of Telangana, AC Guards,Hyderabad.

3. shri B.Janardhan Reddy, commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

4. Shri Nalini Padmavathi,, Dy.Commissioner, Alwal Circle, GHMC, Hyderabad. CONTEMNORS 4oF 201 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the name of petitioner 2nd Respondent in CC.No.1577 of 2017 order dated 02.03.2018 and dispense with presence petitioner/Respondent No.2 the petitioner herein, before this Hon'ble Court on 23.03.2018. CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1588 OF 2017 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents, and punish them for will full disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No.4179712015 dt.6.3-2017 passed by Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar and Sri Justice N.Balayogi.

1. P.LINGAMMA, Wo Balaiah, aged 54 years, 2. Smt.U.Susheela, Wo Kistaiah, aged 56 years. 3. L. Sharanaiah, S/o Yellaiah, aged 61 years. 4. N.Mallaiah, S/o Malialah, aged 61 years. 5. Smt.K.Shanthamma, Wo Sailu, aged 53 years. 6. E.Ramulu, S/o Mysaiah, aged 49 years. (Died) 7. P.Lakshmaiatr, Slo Yellaiah, aged 48 years. 8. P.Sreenivasu, S/o Yadaiah, aged 50 years. 9. Smt.K.Maisamma, Wo Balram, aged 51 years. 10.K.Bala Ram, S/o Balaiah, aged 53 years. 1 1. Smt.K.Mallamma, Wo Yadagiri, aged 51 years. '12. Smt.B.Pochamma, W/o Yadaiah, aged 50 years. 13. Smt.G.Yellamma, Wo Bikshapathy, aged 49 years. 14.Smt.M.Lakshmi, W/o Shivaiah, aged 52years. 15.Smt.N.Yellamma, Wo Rajaiah, aged 53 years. 16.Smt.G.Pushpa, Wo Kistaiah, aged 50 years. 17.Y.Krishna, S/o Mallaiah, aged 52 years. '18. Smt.R.Gandamma, W/o Pochaiah, aged 51 years.

19. Smt.N.Bharathamma, Wo yeilaiah, aged 52 years. 20-SmlP-Salamma, Wo Bikshapathy, aged 51 years. 2 1 . Smt. M.Y'adamma; Wo Lakshmaiah, aged S0- years. 22.C.Narsimha, S/o Sailu, aged 52 years. 23.Smt.E..Mallamma, Wo Narsimha, aged 5,1 years. 24.Smt.P.Pochamma, Wo Komaraiah, aged 52 years. 25. Smt. K.Chandramma, Wo yadaiah, aged 50 years. 26. P.Dasaratha, S/0 Narsimha, aged 4g years. 27. G.Narsimha, S/0 Sailu, aged 53 years. 28.C. Mallesh, S/o Swamy, aged 53 years. 29.G.Balanarasimha, S/o Balaiah, aged 51 years. 30. Smt.P.Lakshmi, W/o Anjaiah, aged 50 years. 31. Smt.P.Susheela, Wo yadaiah, aged 51 years. 32. Smt.Shanthamma, Wo Lingaiah,aged 52 years. 33.Smt.V.Yadamma, Wo Somaiah, aged 5g years. 34.M.Krishna, S/o Chinna Balaiah, aged 52 years. 35. T.Ailaiah, S/o Agaiah, aged 58 years, 36.M.Bal Raj, S/o Pochaiah, aged 52 years. 37. B.Pentaiah, S/o Ramaiah, aged 52 years 38. R.Mohan Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy, aged 4g years. ($ll .ar9 Yolkllg.as Public Health and non Pubtic Health Workers in Kapra Circle-|, GHMC, Hyderabad.) AND PET]TIONERS of Telangana, Secretariat Buildirigs, HyderaUad.

1. NAVEEN MlrrAL, I I g , 2- Smt.T.K.Sridevi,, Commissioner and Director of MunicipalAdministration, prin.cipal secretary; MA and UD Department, state State of Telangana, AC Guards,Hyderabad.

3. shri B.Janardhan Reddy, commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabaci.

4. Smt.S.Panka , Circle Nod, i9', Dy.9ommissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation Kapra, Hyderabad. lA NO:4 oF 2018 ' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to RESPONDENTS i Ii l ,j I delete the name of petition er 2nd Respondent in cc.No.15gg of 2017 order dated 02.03.2018 and dispense with presence petitioner/Respondent No.2 the petitioner herein, before this Honble Court on 23.03.2019. I counsel for the Petitioners : sRt. p RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : Gp FOR SERVICES I counsel for the Respondent No-3 : sRl G. NARAYANA (sc FoR sERVtcE MATTERS OF GHMC & AGR|. MARKET COMMTTTEE) counsel for the Respondent : sRt GHATLA MADHU( sc FORGHMC cRL2s- 30) counsel for the Respondents: sRt L VENKATESHWARA RAo sc FoR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CONTEMPT CASE Nos'1577 and 1588 of 2017 coMMON ORDER: (per Hon',ble sri Justice P.Sam Koshy) Heard Mr.P.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.S.Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of leamed Advocate General appearing for respondent-officers and perused the record.

2. These are two Contempt Cases which had come before this Court against the so-called non compliance of orders passed in w.P.No. 1225 0f 2016 and w.P. No. 4 1797 0f 2015 both of which having got clisposed of on 19.04. 2Ol7 and 06.03 .2017 respectively'

3. Vide the said two orders in the writ petitions, there was a specific direction to the respondents to regularize services of the petitioners in accordance with the G.o.Ms.No-212, dated 22.04.1994 issued by the Government on their fulfilling the requisite eligibility criteria and also on their completion of five years continuous service against the sanctioned vacant posts' The orders of the High Court was subjected to challenge before the 2 Hon'ble Supreme courr vide slp(c) No. l3gl3 of 20lg which got dismissed on 23.07.2024 with a direction to ensure the implementation of the aforesaid orders. Meanwhile, however, .for non-compliance, these Contempt Cases were filed.

4. on the previous dates of hearing, the learned counsel representing the State along with Contemnors, who, are present in the Court, had assured the Bench of making efforts in ensuring that the orders are complied with in its letter and spirit at the earliest. The court has granted then some time and fixed the matter today.

5. Today, again all the incumbent oflicers of the post attached are present in the Court along with their Counsel. The Contermors have filed an affidavit dated 06.1 I .2025 showing the order of compliance made by the court. In the order dated 24.1,0.2025, the respondents have issued proceedings regularizing the (85) persons with effect from the dates reflected against their name in the tist i.e. on completion of five years of continuous service by these (85) persons.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent-Contemnors further has brought to the notice of the court that the pay fixation also has -/ 7r7 /,/ ,-/ 3 \ \ been done in respect of these g5 persons and they have been grantednotionalfixationandseniorityfromactualofregularization till06.03.2ol7thatwasthedateofWP.No.4|797of2015stood decided. Learned counsel for the respondents further has made it clearthatthepetitionerswouldbeentitledforactualmonetary benefitfrom06.03.20|Tonwardsbecauseonwhichdatethe judgmentrenderedbytheHighCourtintheaforesaidwritpetition.

7. During the course of deliberations' the learned State GovemmentCounselfortheContemnorsoninstructionsfromthe officerspresentintheCourthasassuredthateveryendeavourshall bemadeinensuringthattheactualmonetarybenefitisalso released to the petitioners maximum within a period of (90) days fromtoday.Inaddition,theofficerspresentintheCourthavealso throughtheirCounselinformedthatsofarasthepersonswhohave alsostoodretired/expiredduringtheinterveningperiod,the respondentsshallmakeanendeavourinensuringthatthemonetary benefits flowing from the order of regularization is actually releasedtothemwithinaperiodoffourweeks.Sofarasthe remainingpetitionersareconcerned,learnedCounselhasassured t Eiidi.;.ia the respondents shourd positivery make the payments within (90) days period assured.

8. With the aforesaid observations Contempt Cases stand disposed of. The respondents stand discharged from the contempt proceedings. Their presence also stands dispensed with. No costs. and directions, these Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in both the cases shall stand closed. /TRUE COPY// SD/. N.SRIHARI REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. NAVEEN MITTAL, l.A.S., , Principal Secretary, MA and UD Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad'

2. Smt.T. K.Sridevi,, Commissioner and Director of MunicipalAdministration, State of Telangana, AC Guards'Hyderabad'

3. Shri B.Janardhan Reddy, commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, HYderabad.

4. Shri Nalini Padmavathi,, Dy.Commissioner, Alwal Circle, GHMC, Hyderabad' 5. One CC to SRl. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Advocate IoPUCI 6. Two CCs to Gp FOR SERVICES l, High court for the State of Telangana.

7. One CC to SRl. CHATLA MADHU( SC FORGHMC CRL25-30 ), High court toitne State of Telangana [OPUC]

8. One CC to SRl. L VENKATESHWARA RAO SC FOR GHMC, High court for the State of Telangana [OPUC]

9. One CC to Sri G. Narayana, sc for service matters of GHMC & Agricultural Market Committee.

10.Two CD CoPies ASR/PSL w 1 HIGH COURT DATED:06/1 112025 ORDER CC.No .1577 ol 2017 * CG.No.1588 ol 2017 'i /.';i 't : ,} ;,. 'l I c') ir ! 2 0 EEr itl?s * if't.i. r,. . ..,- CLOSING THE CONTEMPTS p .C" W