M.Malleswara Rao v. Boddepalli Sanyasi Rao
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
:PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. BALAYOGI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4129 OF 2010 Between: M.Malleswara Rao, S/o Pentayya ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant AND Boddepalli Sanyasi Rao, S/o Ramulu, R/o Kanugulavalasa Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. ... Res pon denURes pondenUPlaintiff WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA presented this Petition under Section 1 1 5 of C. P.C, to allow the CRP by setting aside the order dated 7-6-2010 passed in lA.No.81/2007 in OS.No. 65/2003 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Amadalavalasa. AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein returnable in two weeks to show cause as to why this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted. You viz: Boddepalli Sanyasi Rao, S/o Ramulu R/o Kanugulavalasa Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition/appeal and the affidaviUmemorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CIVIL REVISION PETITION should not be admitted. The Court made the following ORDER: lssue fresh notice to the responiJenUs returnable in two weeks, to correct address. Counsel for petitioner/s is permitted to take out personal notice on the respondents/s to the correct address by RPAD and file proof of service in Registry' I Post after two weeks. //TRUE COPY// SD/-V. SUDTIA ASSIS NTR ISTRAR FoT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ To,
#1. Boddepalli Sanyasi Rao, S/o Ramulu R/o Kanugulavalasa Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
#2. One CC to SRI KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Advocate IOPUC] 3. One spare copy i t I i : i I , HIGH COURT NBYJ DATED:25/10/2018 POST AFTERTWO WEEKS NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRP.No.4129 of 2010 (... c
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.