THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/4161/2021 KITAB ALI @ MD KITAB ALI S/O LATE JABED ALI VILL- LACHANGA P.O. CHARCHARIA P.S. KALGACHIA DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM PIN-781319 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A B KHABIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
Operative part
05.01.2022 ORDER This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying for pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Kitab Ali @ Md. Kitab Ali, in connection with Abhayapuri Police Station Case No. 876/2021, registered under Sections 14/15 of the Assam Game Page No.# 2/2 and Betting Act, 1970. Heard Mr. A.S. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the Respondent State. The case diary produced has been perused. It appears from the materials available in the case diary that there is specific materials collected against the peititoner about his involvement with the alleged offence. It has also come out from the materials that the money collected through betting was deposited to the present petitioner and other co-accused got share thereof. It further appears from the materials in the case diary that the present petitioner is the kingpin in organizing the games and betting involved in this case. Considering such material in the case diary, this Court is of the view that this is not a fit case for grant of the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail made by the petitioner is rejected. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.