✦ Gauhati High Court · 04 Mar 2022

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Ab No. 397 of 2022HITESH KUMAR SARMA

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Mar 2022
Bench
HITESH KUMAR SARMA

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/397/2022 MD. IMRAN HUSSAIN S/O HAJARAT ALI R/O PUB-SHOBALANI P.S. LAWKHOWA DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA Date : 04-03-2022 ORDER Heard Mr. SM Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State respondent. This is an application, filed under Section 438 of the Cr.PC. seeking pre- Page No.# 2/2 arrest bail of the petitioner, namely, Md. Imran Hussain, in connection with Rupahihat P.S. Case No. 563/2021 registered under Sections 188/353/34 of the IPC read with Sections 14/15 of the Assam Game & Betting Act, 1970. It has been submitted by Mr. Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor that charge-sheet has been laid, vide CS No. 26/2022, dated 25.02.2022 in the instant case by the Investigating Police Officer. However, since the petitioner has been availing interim protection, the same is extended for another 15 (fifteen) days from today. That being so, if so advised, the petitioner shall appear before the learned court below within the next 15 (fifteen) days from today with an appropriate application for bail, which the learned court below shall consider on its own merit. In the event, the petitioner do not appear before the learned court below within the next 15 (fifteen) days, the interim protection granted to him, vide order, dated 14.02.2022 shall automatically stand vacated. With the above observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 188, 353.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gauhati High Court, on 04 Mar 2022. The bench was HITESH KUMAR SARMA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ab No. 397 of 2022). ← Search more judgments