CID PS CASE No. 101 of 2011 · Gauhati High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BS Sinha, learned Addl. PP, Ass am. Perused the case diary and materials available on record. The accused is named in the FIR. The offence alleged against the petitioner is serious one and the co-accused has already been arrested by the police. On careful perusal of the materials on record, it appears that there are suffici ent incriminating materials, warranting custodial interrogation of the petitione r in connection with the case. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Bail application stands closed.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.