Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this application is allowed as pray
Judgment
r crept in order dated 26.5.2011 passed by this Court in PIL No.30/2009. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the word (cid:28)Gagarbera (cid:29) appe aring in the third line of the order should have been (cid:28)Nagarbera (cid:29). After hearing the learned counsel for applicant we are of the view that the prayer ought to be granted. Accordingly, this application is allowed as pray ed. The word (cid:28)Gagarbera (cid:29), which was typed in the third line of order dated 2
6.5.2011 be read as (cid:28)Nagarbera (cid:29). Misc. case stands disposed of. This order shall be treated as part of the order dated 26.5.2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.