GUWAHATI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn with
Judgment
Operative part
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2182/2026 THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MOTOR TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAVAN - 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI -110001. 2: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) G- 5 AND 6 SECTOR-10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075 REPRESENTED BY THE PROJECT DIRECTOR PROJECT IMPLEMENT UNIT (PIU)- GUWAHATI VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, FOOD, PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DARRANG MANGALDAI O/O THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DARRANG MANGALDAI - 784125 REPRESENTED BY THE LD. CHAIRMAN. 3:JAYANTA DEKA ADVOCATE MANGALDAI DISTRICT COURT MANGALDAI-- 784125. Page No.# 2/3 4:JATIN NATH ADVOCATE MANGALDAI DISTRICT COURT MANGALDAI - -784125. 5:NAYANMONI DEKA ADVOCATE MANGALDAI DISTRICT COURT MANGALDAI- - 784125. 6:KALPANA DEKA ADVOCATE MANGALDAI DISTRICT COURT MANGALDAI - -784125. 7:NIROD DEKA ADVOCATE MANGALDAI DISTRICT COURT MANGALDAI - 784125. 8:THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF PWD DISPUR GUWAHATI -781006. 9:CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (NH WORKS) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI - 781003 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. C BORUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, PWD Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI Date : 27.04.2026 ORDER As prayed for by Mr. C. Boruah, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn with
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 27 Apr 2026. The bench was KAUSHIK GOSWAMI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.