THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 03 Jun 2026
- Bench
- KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Outcome
Dismissed
No Steps”, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution
Judgment
Operative part
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5861/2015 MD. KHALIL AHMED TALUKDAR and 80 ORS S/O- MUBARAK ALI TALUKDAR, R/O- NEW CONSTRUCTION JAMIRA BAGICHA, P.O.- JAMIRA, P.S.- RAMPUR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, ASSAM, GHY- 6. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S BORTHAKUR, MR.D GOGOI,MR.P K BORA Advocate for the Respondent : MRS.V L SINGHSC,PWDNH.and Bld.R-4and5, SC, PWD (ROADS) (R3 & 4),GA, ASSAM(R1-3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI Date : 03.06.2026 ORDER Page No.# 2/2 None appears for the petitioners despite the matter being listed before this Court under the column “Order No Steps” as item No. 1 in the cause list, duly reflecting the name of the learned counsels for the petitioners. Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel for the PWD; Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are present. Considering that the learned counsels for the petitioners have not taken steps till date and have also remained unrepresented before this Court when the matter has been listed under the column “Order No Steps”, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: No Steps”, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 03 Jun 2026. The bench was KAUSHIK GOSWAMI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.