WRITAPPEALNo.^0 / 2013 v. The Secretary, Urban Administration
Judgment
Shri Siddharth Komal Pardesi, aged obout 35 yeors, presently posted as Collector, Raipur, Collectorote Campus, Raipur P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur District-Raipur(C.G.). The Additional Tahsildor, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil & District - Roipur (C.G.) Shri Pulok BhQttQchorya, Additional Tahsildar, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil & District - Raipur (C.G.) The Returning Officer/Collector, Raipur, Collectorate Campus, Roipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil & District - Raipur (C.G.)
Shri Sanjay Shrivastava, aged about 45 yeors, Ex/removed ChQirmon, Municipol Corporotion Campus, Raipur ond Corporotor Word No. 31 Shankor Nagar, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil & District- RaipurfC.G.) Shri Sahdev Vyavhar, aged about 45 years,.Councilor Rani Durgawoti Word No. 45, R/0 Amlidih, Ravigram P.S. Telibandha, Tahsil & District- Raipur (C.G.). ®
The Union India, Through Director, Central Bureau Investigation. Plot No 5-B, 6th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003.
The Bhartiya Janta Party, Through : The General Secretary, Bhartiya Janta Party, Ekatma Parisar, Near Nav-Bharat Press, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsit & District-Raipur (C.G.). i WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006. :C—78 Tc^r ^ww^, tSTfl't-i'Ko', (si^iyy 'WR^T ^b^lch .a§ST-...216Ils. 20 •••?Ft CT^T V^K (4c<f^<i^T) ^T ^T fc,'li<=b ^^3 ^T 5h^l<=h '^TT^R'^ftn 3T[^T <=t>i^{<n4-i T?TR^f 'SF '^'3?f7THW^T .Fs^l if^^K ^^ TTFT'ft^T ^sV ^TT^T^'^T «fr M^s f^ ?qT^Rf «ft-5ftf^T^: f^T^T o9.Ql<.?0?3 31ln<y|cbcfT T9T ^f ^R: ^ ^ ^T.^'.^rf, 3rf^|<=t4dl ^rf^RTi ^-d<c|l<{1 T?r/9TKFT ^ 3|^lP.CW ^^l^|c1<tdl ^rf^RTI ^Tl<c|l<{1 ITCT ^o-^ ^f STto^TT ^rf^RTI 3TT^ t ^t f^Tk ^TT^, 3TR: t ^f chlRl4) ?T^T, 31lf1<?14>dl STto^cTT ^t kTgNT t f^ ^ W TTT^ ^T ^ 3T^r ^r^tfr ^i^i^l ^r^r ^r^i t, f^r^ f^' ^i ^ spft^- ^pro- ^r ^)- 3p]7Tft ^l' ^TTT| 3|lfl<y|cbdl 3Tto5RTT ^| ST^tST TK, ^T^f HT^f'TT ^FRT ^ ^t Sl^fcl ^te <<f|chi< ^^" iq: ^ sriN", ^rf^r ^" ^TRfr t| Sd/- ChiefJustice ^s^l)r Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^ .^^ \V)N
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.