Rajesh Kum.ar ^Sonwani v. State of Chhattisgarh
Judgment
Rajesh Kum.ar ^Sonwani, S/o. Shri Gulichand, Aged about 32 Harija<n, Driver, years, Caste R/o. Village & Post-Mahora, P.S. Patna, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). Tahsil ...-••"" RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Relation, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G,).
The Director, Directorate, Public Relation Raipur (C.G.). The Assistant Director, Public Relation, Baikunthpur, District Koriya(C.G.). The District Public Relation Officer, Baikunthpur, District Koriya(C.G.):
The Collector, District Koriya (C.G.). Baikunthpur, WRIT^PPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF THE CHHATTISG^H HIGIiC^URTJAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006 ?v ^^fl^T7T^ ^^" ?q'TqT^'q"f f^'^TT^T^ (^o^To) ?PT^T (ft5 3TTT^T ^5 +1lr1rTl'4 ^9T ^I<4I^R{ ^fr ^Tpft7? f^ +iiriT{1'4 n^i^ii^J^ ^ >fifacn< f^qiq->< te. •?o3^o^ ^o- 3<lD<?14)df T^T- ^T^T ^TK <flr|c)lrTl ^•d<c||c{l IT^'- ^>-d1^^l<o ?TRPT ^" 3T?q- te srft^- si^i4d STRT--?('?') ^-dl^i'ii^ ^cq- ^n^i<>i<L) ('?PT^T ^} f^zpT ?oo^ ^Tf^rf^- : 3l41<>)chd1' CRT ^l" sft^ ^" ^" 3T?T^ ?^T, 3Tf^cjct^|| ^-d<c<l41 CRT/?TRFT ^f STT^: ^ ^ ^T^TT ^KT, ^T ^ll^c^^i 3Tf^^TT| (^ 3{^T ^o^) o^. ^fr '<T^F ^TK ^)r1^lrTl, (3Tlft^^Tf) ^T'T ^TPT^, f^TT-chiR^l chl'LlI^'L) ^U6^<, if^ ^FT ^fr ^ ^T ^ chl^<d ^TT| ^LH^chdI ^)' f^rN 0^.^.^°^ ^ ^^ ^t ^PT ^ ^<T 7TZTT» '^' o!T^Rf ^T ^T^T -cll<?lct> ^ CR' T^ ite: ^T^ ^nf^T W9rTT- ^^S^o^ l^^T ^l<44l6 ^ ^T^T 3TT?TT f^TT^ o^.o^.-^o^ ^t f^R^T ^rf^T ^t"| ^^T ^l^cbl ^: ^t" TT^, f^rat ^r ^^ ^ te ^^ W ^^ft^ ^ ^T^T 5T^T ^t" ^ t| y ^ -^- o^. ^T, ^^TT^T 3Tf^c)4(-||3T|- ^" ^•TT| o^. 31lD<?1chd1' ^ tf^ ^FT ^fNt ^ ^T ^ W^T ^TI ^ f^TFT SKT ST^- ^^T STFf ^T^ 'T^f ^fr ^T '^t' t, Hl' ^ ^T ^ ^ "^ ^T ^tf arf^K ^f t| ^^T ct)| <uH< ^T <^[^.<ia ^i^ ^r T^^T "qiq4l6 ^ 3l41<?1cb<ll ^ ^lFq^l 3TT?TT f^TT^ o\9.o^.^o^ g[nT ^lP,^ ^: ^Tf ^: ?T^f ^t" oY. ^ ^ ^^TT ^f^T ^n- f^ zrf^ ^TZT ^- ^-^ ^T^T ^r^r^ ^r ^pf ^t, ^TT ^Tl<c||<{1 T^T ^rt ^T ^^ f^ 31lD<>|chdI ^T ^TT^T^TT ^T ^, 11^ ^T'T ^Nt ^ ^q" ^" ^^T (K T< ^t 5FT: ^T ^ o^. f^uTaft' ^ ^TPT, ^ te Spfl^T ^rf^T ^l" <-)cbdl t| ^4<lck1 "^' ^Kft tl Sd/- ChiefJustice ^Rl^T Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.